This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Go to /pro/cpd-dashboard page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. CPD dashboard

Go to /account/subscription-details page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. Upgrade to Pro

Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction (DAPA-HF)

Authoring team

Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction (DAPA-HF)

DAPA-HF trial enrolled 4744 HFrEF patients (symptomatic HF, EF <=40%, NT-proBNP >= 600 pg/mL) and those with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2, symptomatic hypotension, SBP <95 mmHg or type 1 diabetes were excluded.

Primary endpoint was worsening HF event (unplanned HF hospitalization or an urgent HF visit requiring IV therapy) or CV death.

Main results

  • Treatment with dapagliflozin resulted in a reduction of the primary endpoint of CV death and worsening HF event compared to placebo (HR: 0.74, 95%CI: 0.65-0.85, P=0.00001, NNT=21)
  • All-cause death was reduced in the dapagliflozin group compared to the placebo group (HR: 0.83, 95%CI: 0.71-0.97, P=0.022). In the dapagliflozin group, percentage of patients with >= 5 point improvement in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) was increased and percentage of patients with >= 5 point deterioration was lowered compared to the placebo group.
  • Individual endpoints (HF hospitalization/urgent HF visit, HF hospitalization, CV death, CV death/HF hospitalization, death from any cause) were all reduced in those who were on dapagliflozin compared to those who were on placebo. Dapagliflozin was well tolerated.

Regarding side effects, 178 patients (7.5%) in the dapagliflozin group had an adverse event related to volume depletion compared to 162 (6.8%) in the placebo group, with no significant difference between groups. Adverse events related to renal dysfunction occurred in 153 patients (6.5%) in the dapagliflozin group versus 170 patients (7.2%) in the placebo group, with no significant difference between groups. Major hypoglycaemia and lower limb amputation and fracture were infrequent and occurred at similar rates in the two treatment groups.

Dapagliflozin reduced the composite outcome of CV death and worsening HF event in HFrEF patients with and without diabetes in comparison to placebo. In addition, CV death was reduced and symptoms improved with dapagliflozin therapy compared to placebo

 

 

 

Commentary (2):

  • "DAPA-HF could be "tectonic" in how it affects care of patients with heart failure - with or without diabetes.
    • DAPA-HF involved the use of dapagliflozin 10mg or placebo to patients with symptomatic heart failure (having an ejection fraction of less than 40%). This was in addition to optimum care with drugs prescribed from primary care such as beta blockers, diuretics and ACE inhibitors; as well as other therapies such as sacubutril.
    • The headline from the study was - over a median of just over 18 months, there was a relative risk reduction of the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure of 22% in the dapa treated patient group - a NNT of 21.
    • There was also no difference in incidence of significant hypoglycaemia in comparison to placebo or dapa treated individuals.
    • This study says that in addition to optimum therapy, adding dapagliflozin will reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or worsening of heart failure by 1/5 - and this effect shown in a relatively short study. Obviously, this is the first of the studies of SGLT2s in heart failure (and others are in the trial pipeline) but I am certain GPs will shortly (if not already) be seeing dapagliflozin 10mg being prescribed to patients with heart failure by cardiology teams."

Reference:


Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.