This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Go to /pro/cpd-dashboard page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. CPD dashboard

Go to /account/subscription-details page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. Upgrade to Pro

Diagnostic scoring system for necrotising fasciitis

Authoring team

Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis scoring system (LRNEC) is considered to be the most accurate diagnostic scoring system currently in use (1). It is used to differentiate NF from other type of soft tissue infection based on the laboratory investigations

  • a score of
    • 5 points-indicates a low risk (<50% probability) of NF
    • 6-7 points-indicate and intermediate risk (50%-75% probability)
    • 8 points or more - indicate a high risk (>75% probability) (2)
  • in a Singaporean population, a score of ≥6 was 93% sensitive and 92% specific for necrotising fasciitis while in UK it was only 74% sensitive and 81% specific.

variable

score

C reactive protein (mg/L)

 

>150

4

white blood cell count (per mm3)

 

<15

0

15-25

1

>25

 

haemoglobin (g/dL)

 

>13.5

0

11-13.5

1

<11

2

sodium (mmol/L)

 

<135

2

creatinine

 

>141

2

glucose (mmol/L)

 

>10

1

Reference:


Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.