This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Go to /pro/cpd-dashboard page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. CPD dashboard

Go to /account/subscription-details page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. Upgrade to Pro

ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) in patients at high risk of vascular disease

Authoring team

  • in patients who have vascular disease or high-risk diabetes without heart failure, angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular causes (1,2)
    • ACE inhibitors (ramipril in the HOPE study and perindopril in the EUROPA study) have been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of CV events and death in patients at high risk of these events
  • however the role of angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) in such patients is less clear
  • the ONTARGET investigators compared the ACE inhibitor ramipril, the ARB telmisartan, and the combination of the two drugs in patients with vascular disease or high-risk diabetes
    • after a median follow-up of 56 months, there was no significant difference in the rates of the primary outcome (a composite of death from CV causes, myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalisation for heart failure)
      • rate was 16.5% in the ramipril group, 16.7% in the telmisartan group (relative risk [RR] compared to ramipril 1.01, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.09) and 16.3% in the combination group (RR compared to ramipril 0.99, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.07)
    • adverse effects:
      • significantly more patients in the ramipril group than in the telmisartan group stopped treatment due to cough (4.2% vs. 1.1%, P<0.001, number needed to harm [NNH] 32) or angioedema (0.3% vs. 0.1%, P=0.01, NNH 500), but more patients in the telmisartan group stopped treatment due to hypotensive symptoms (2.7% vs. 1.7%, P<0.001, NNH 100)
      • patients taking the combination therapy were more likely than those taking ramipril alone to discontinue treatment due to hypotensive symptoms (4.8% vs. 1.7%, P<0.001, NNH 32), diarrhoea (0.5% vs. 0.1%, P<0.001, NNH 250), syncope (0.3% vs. 0.2%, P=0.03, NNH=1000) and renal impairment (1.1% vs. 0.7%, P<0.001, NNH 250)
    • a MeReC publication (4) concluded that:
      • there seems little to be gained from adding telmisartan to an evidence-based dose of an ACE inhibitor in patients at high risk of CV events who do not also have heart failure. Indeed using the combination increases the risk of adverse effects serious enough to cause patients to stop treatment (for example, hypotensive episodes, diarrhoea and renal impairment). The combination of an ARB and ACE inhibitor may be an option in patients with chronic heart failure

Reference:


Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.