This site is intended for healthcare professionals

CPD
CPD
Pro
Pro
account_circleSign in
Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Go to /pro/cpd-dashboard page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. CPD dashboard

Go to /account/subscription-details page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. Upgrade to Pro

Diagnostic imaging

Last reviewed dd mmm yyyy. Last edited dd mmm yyyy

Authoring team

Radiographic features are as follows:

  • radiographs may show only soft tissue swelling for the first two weeks
  • periosteal new bone formation is visible by the end of the second week. Later, the sequestrum becomes rarefied and ragged
  • neighbouring bone may become sclerotic - for example the femoral head scleroses during osteomyelitis of the proximal femur, suggesting avascularity of the sclerotic bone and possible necrosis

Other imaging includes:

  • ultrasound may be very useful in localising subperiostial pus and guiding needle aspiration
  • bone scan using 99m-Tc diphosphonates is very sensitive for osteomyelitis at all stages. Indium-labelled leukocytes may be more specific for infection
  • MRI can distinguish pus from blood and may be helpful
    • a meta-analysis found that MRI performed well in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the foot and ankle and can be used to rule in or rule out the diagnosis.
      • magnetic resonance imaging performance was markedly superior to that of technetium Tc 99m bone scanning, plain radiography, and white blood cell studies

Reference:

  1. Kapoor A et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing foot osteomyelitis: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jan 22;167(2):125-32

Create an account to add page annotations

Create a free account

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.