This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Go to /pro/cpd-dashboard page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. CPD dashboard

Go to /account/subscription-details page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. Upgrade to Pro

McKenzie method of LBP (low back pain) treatment

Last reviewed dd mmm yyyy. Last edited dd mmm yyyy

Authoring team

McKenzie method of LBP (low back pain) treatment

  • the McKenzie method of LBP (low back pain) treatment is explained by the principle that exercises that encourage disc centralisation should be promoted, and exercises that encourage disc peripheralisation should be avoided
    • after initial assessments, patients are arranged into four groups:
      • postures,
      • derangements,
      • dysfunctions, and
      • the presence of any non-mechanical syndromes
    • in patients with chronic LBP, many pain measures showed that the McKenzie method is a successful treatment to decrease pain in the short term, while the disability measures determined that the McKenzie method is better in enhancing function in the long term (1)

See https://www.physio-pedia.com/McKenzie_Method for further details

Reference


Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.