This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Go to /pro/cpd-dashboard page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. CPD dashboard

Go to /account/subscription-details page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. Upgrade to Pro

Treatment

Authoring team

Undertaken by specialist services.

Assessing risk of violence is not routine in primary care, but if such assessment is required consider (1):

  • current or previous violence, including severity, circumstances, precipitants and victims
  • the presence of comorbid mental disorders and/or substance misuse
  • current life stressors, relationships and life events
  • additional information from written records or families and carers (subject to the person's consent and right to confidentiality), because the person with antisocial personality disorder might not always be a reliable source of information
  • healthcare professionals in primary care should consider contact with and/or referral to secondary or forensic services where there is current violence or threats that suggest significant risk and/or a history of serious violence, including predatory offending or targeting of children or other vulnerable people

Various types of treatment have been applied, but their efficacy remains to be demonstrated.

  • medication:
    • pharmacological interventions should not be routinely used for the treatment of antisocial personality disorder or associated behaviours of aggression, anger and impulsivity (1)
    • beneficial effects of drugs for the treatment of personality disorders are usually quite modest (2)
    • mood stabilizers, such as lithium, may have a role in treating antisocial, aggressive, emotionally unstable and assaultive behaviour (2)
    • pharmacological intervention may be indicated for co-morbid disorders such as depression and anxiety or drug misuse

Individual psychotherapy: some psychopaths may be helped by a form of supportive psychotherapy in which the therapist is friendly, sympathetic, and mildly directive without being disapproving.

Group psychotherapy:

Authoritarian disciplinary regimes - an example is Herstedvester (Denmark), a locked, maximum security institution for the treatment of criminal psychopaths. The main factors are an indeterminate sentence, strict discipline and individual psychotherapy at moments of crisis.

Controlled trials of treatment - Craft studied psychopaths where one group of patients received group psychotherapy in a self-governing ward, and another group were given firm discipline and direction with a hierachical staffing system. After a two year follow-up the authoritarian group did better in terms of such criteria as number of offences committed, need for further institutional care etc.

Reference:


Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.