This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Go to /pro/cpd-dashboard page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. CPD dashboard

Go to /account/subscription-details page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. Upgrade to Pro

Sample size and power of study

Last reviewed dd mmm yyyy. Last edited dd mmm yyyy

Authoring team

Sample size and power

  • clinical studies such as randomised controlled trials are designed to test whether a difference exists between two or more interventions in terms of specific outcomes or endpoints
  • in order for a study to detect a statistically significant difference between treatments, the study must be large enough (i.e. have enough subjects participating in the study) for a sufficient number of endpoints of interest to occur

  • the 'power' of the study is the ability of the study to reliably detect a difference between interventions
    • number of subjects required to be included in the study in order to have sufficient power must be made before a study begins
    • ideally clinical study reports should indicate that a power calculation has been made - it is common for studies to stipulate a power of 80–90%
    • the power of a study refers to its ability to detect a difference only in that endpoint on which the power calculation is based, i.e. the primary endpoint. The power used in the study may not be sufficient to reliably detect differences in other (secondary) endpoints or in subgroups

    • the power of a study can be calculated via knowledge of the type II error (a type II error arises when the null hypothesis is accepted when it is false) (1)
      • power (the chance that the study will detect the minimum difference as statistically different) = 1 - type II error
      • in effect the power of a study is
        • the likelihood that a study will detect an effect when there is an effect there to be detected

Reference:

  1. Evidence Based Medicine 2006;11:69-70.
  2. MeReC Briefing (2005);30:1-7.
  3. Wiebe S. The principles of evidence-based medicine.Cephalalgia. 2000;20 Suppl 2:10-3.
  4. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;19(1):15-26.

Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.