This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages without signing in

Comparator drugs in statistical studies

Last reviewed dd mmm yyyy. Last edited dd mmm yyyy

Authoring team

Comparator drugs and doses studied:

  • when a study has a comparator intervention against an active control, it is important that any comparisons that are made are fair
    • if a drug of interest was being compared with a control drug with respect to side effects then it would be an unfair comparison if a low dose of a drug of interest was compared with a high dose of a control drug because will have the effect of minimising the risk of side effects from the drug of interest and potentially maximising the harms seen with the control drug
    • if a drug of interest was compared with a control drug with respect to efficacy then an unfair comparison would be to compare a high dose of the drug of interest with a low dose of an active control drug - this would potentially maximise the efficacy of the drug of interest, but may minimise the efficacy of the control drug

Reference:

  1. MeReC Briefing (2005);30:1-7.
  2. Wiebe S. The principles of evidence-based medicine.Cephalalgia. 2000;20 Suppl 2:10-3.

Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.