Last reviewed dd mmm yyyy. Last edited dd mmm yyyy
According to Clark (1,2), there are five levels of invasion for malignant melanoma which are another factor used in assessing prognosis:
I: confined to epidermis, in situ |
II: invasion of the papillary dermis |
III: filling of the papillary dermis, but no extension into the reticular dermis |
IV: invasion of the reticular dermis |
V: invasion of the subcutaneous tissue |
In the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 2002 Staging system for malignant melanoma there is less significance with respect to the use of Clark's levels in determining prognosis. Analysis of histopathologic features of melanoma comparing Clark’s level and Breslow’s depth have shown that the actual tumour thickness is more predictive of outcome and that there are no natural break-points of survival, as believed previously. However there is an instance in which Clark’s level invasion continues to carry prognostic information: In patients with “thin”(<1.0 mm) melanoma, Clark’s level IV or V lesion portends a worse prognosis. For this reason, pathologists need to continue to include Clark’s level along with tumour thickness and ulceration in the histology report of the primary melanoma (3). Also ulceration of a primary tumour was associated with a worse prognosis than a non-ulcerated lesion (3).
Reference:
Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.