This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Go to /pro/cpd-dashboard page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. CPD dashboard

Go to /account/subscription-details page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. Upgrade to Pro

Bruising in physical abuse

Last reviewed dd mmm yyyy. Last edited dd mmm yyyy

Authoring team

Bruising is the commonest abusive injury seen in a suspected case of physical abuse (1).

They are common in a normal active child. However, they tend to occur in specific places - shins, elbows, foreheads. Bruising in other places is more suggestive of physical abuse.

  • be aware that a patient of any age may face an abusive situation leading to bruising (2)
  • it is important not to misdiagnose mongolian blue spots as bruises
  • bruises on the inner thighs or genitalia are suggestive of sexual abuse.

NICE have suggested guidance concerning bruises in a child where child maltreatment should be suspected or considered (3):

  • child maltreatment should be suspected if a child or young person has bruising in the shape of a hand, ligature, stick, teeth mark, grip or implement
  • child maltreatment be suspected if there is bruising or petechiae that are not caused by a medical condition (for example, a causative coagulation disorder) and if the explanation for the bruising is unsuitable . Examples where a clinician would suspect child maltreatment include:
    • bruising in a child who is not independently mobile
    • multiple bruises or bruises in clusters
    • bruises of a similar shape and size
    • bruises on any non-bony part of the body or face including the eyes, ears and buttocks
    • bruises on the neck that look like attempted strangulation
    • bruises on the ankles and wrists that look like ligature marks

Notes:

  • suspect
    • for the purposes of this guidance, to suspect child maltreatment means a serious level of concern about the possibility of child maltreatment but is not proof of it (3)
  • It is important to differentiate accidental from abusive bruises
    • accidental bruising in young children
      • depends on their level of independent mobility. The prevalence of experiencing accidental bruises is,
        • <1% in non-mobile infants
        • 17% in crawling, cruising infants
        • >50% in walking infants (1)
      • is seen in specific locations
        • occurs on the front of the body and over bony prominences
          • <6% of accidental bruises to the face are found on the cheeks or periorbital area

    • abusive bruises
      • although any part of the body may be involved, abusive bruises should be suspected if seen predominantly on the cheeks, neck, genitals, buttocks, and back (1,4)
      • involvement of the forearms, upper limb and adjoining area of trunk, or outside thigh may indicate 'defensive bruising' (when the child has tried to protect themselves from the blows) (1)
      • if associated with petechiae is a strong predictor of abusive injury (but the absence of petechiae is of no diagnostic value)
      • occasionally the imprint of the weapon (e.g. - studded dog collar, belt buckle) might be visible (1)

Reference:


Related pages

Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.