This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Go to /pro/cpd-dashboard page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. CPD dashboard

Go to /account/subscription-details page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. Upgrade to Pro

Choice of resuscitation fluid

Last reviewed dd mmm yyyy. Last edited dd mmm yyyy

Authoring team

The choice of resuscitation fluid for major burns has remained an area of controversy. The main pathophysiological problem is that there is a period of obligatory vessel permeability and hence oedema.

Other considerations include the:

  • replacement of water or salts
  • risk of ionic or glucose extremes
  • availability of fluid
  • risk of allergic reaction
  • interference with cross-matching
  • cost of fluid

Because it is widely available, lactated Ringer's solution (Hartmann Solution) is recommended by the British Burns Association. It is used mainly in the first 24 hours.

The arguments for and against other fluids are described in the submenu.


Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.