This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages without signing in

Surgical

Last reviewed dd mmm yyyy. Last edited dd mmm yyyy

Authoring team

Surgery is rarely employed in PMS and should be considered only as a last resort (1).

When treating women with severe PMS, hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy has been shown to be of benefit

  • hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy can be considered when medical management has failed, long-term GnRH analogue treatment is required or other gynaecological conditions indicate surgery
  • surgery should not be contemplated without preoperative use of GnRH analogues as a test of cure and to ensure that HRT is tolerated

Women being surgically treated for PMS should be advised to use HRT, particularly if they are younger than 45 years of age

When treating women with severe PMS, endometrial ablation and hysterectomy with conservation of the ovaries are not recommended

  • bilateral oophorectomy alone (without removal of the uterus) will necessitate the use of a progestogen as part of any subsequent HRT regimen and this carries a risk of reintroduction of PMS-like symptoms (progestogen-induced PMD).

Reference:


Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.