FREE subscriptions for doctors and students... click here
You have 3 more open access pages.
- the value of HbA1c is thought, by many clinicians, to provide an accurate
measure of of glycaemic control in diabetes
- however there exists large
intra-individual differences exist in the relationship between population mean
plasma glucose levels and HbA1c
- the DCCT (1) revealed that for patients
with a mean plasma glucose of 10 mmol/l, HbA1c values ranged between 6% and 11%
- therefore aiming for the same HbA1c in all patients therefore will mean
that the target will be unrealistically low in some (with potential risk of hypoglycaemia)
and unrealistically high in others, providing false reassurance (2)
- HbA1c
measurements rely on a predictable effect of glucose concentration on hemoglobin
(Hb) over a normal red blood cell (RBC) life span - however any condition that
alters RBC survival may invalidate HbA1c as an accurate measure of glycaemic control
- for example hemolytic anaemias results in decreased RBC survival and hence
reduced HbA1c;
- iron deficiency anaemia results in a modest reduction in
RBC survival
- samples containing variant Hb cause erroneous results in
measurement of HbA1c
- note that a 95% around an HbA1c result
of 7% would be 6.6% to 7.4% if there was a total coefficient of variation of 2.5%
- therefore the clinician must consider these potential sources
of variation when interpreting an HbA1c result
For
more details regarding variation in HbA1c with specific conditions then see linked
items.
Reference:
- Rohlfing, C.L. et al. Defining the relationship
between plasma glucose and HbA(1c): analysis of glucose profiles and HbA(1c) in
the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care 2002;25(2): 275-278.
- Kilpatrick,
E.S. et al.Biological variation of glycated hemoglobin. Implications for diabetes
screening and monitoring. Diabetes Care 1998;21(2): 261-264
Last reviewed 01/2018
Links: