This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Cervical screening in under 25 year olds

Authoring team

It has been shown that approximately one in three women under 25 years will have abnormal cervical cytology samples (as opposed to one in 14 for all women screened) (1)

  • these changes are frequently due to natural and harmless changes in the cervix which, if left untreated would resolve spontaneously (1,2)

Detection of these abnormalities will result in unnecessary additional testing and potentially harmful treatment (1,2)

  • research suggests that taking tissue from cervix (for diagnosis, for removal of abnormal area or both) causes an increased risk of pre term births
  • it has been shown that for every 100,000 women screened in this group, around 100 to 350 will have pre term deliveries (1)

Furthermore the incidence of cervical cancer in women under 25 years is low with 56 cases of cervical cancer patients in the age group of 15-24 years being registered in 2007 in England and Wales (2).

However women who are concerned about their sexual health or with risk or symptoms of cervical cancer should visit their GP or local genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic (1,2)

Reference:


Create an account to add page annotations

Add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation, such as a web address or phone number. This information will always be displayed when you visit this page

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.