This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Ethical considerations

Last reviewed dd mmm yyyy. Last edited dd mmm yyyy

Authoring team

The 1967 Abortion Act lays down that no persons are required to participate in any treatment authorized by the Act to which they have a conscientious objection unless the treatment is necessary to save the woman's life or prevent serious injury.

This does not absolve the practitioner of his/her general duty of care. Where the doctor feels unable to be involved in an abortion, the patient should be referred to another practitioner.

The act makes no provision for "abortion on demand" or abortion for social reasons. However the assessment of the threat to maternal health includes social factors such as support from the father, financial status etc.

All women seeking abortion have the right to confidentiality. Only in exceptional circumstances, where the health, safety or welfare of a minor or other persons is at risk, may information be disclosed to a third party.

Reference:

  1. Royal college of obstetricians and gynaecologists (RCOG) 2011. The care of women requesting induced abortion. Evidence based clinical guideline number 7.

Related pages

Create an account to add page annotations

Add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation, such as a web address or phone number. This information will always be displayed when you visit this page

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.