This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Go to /sign-in page

You can view 5 more pages before signing in

Go to /pro/cpd-dashboard page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. CPD dashboard

Go to /account/subscription-details page

This page is worth 0.05 CPD credits. Upgrade to Pro

Geneva rule in the clinical prediction of pulmonary embolus (PE)

Authoring team

Wells et al developed a simple clinical model which was able to predict the possibility of a patient having a PE.

It contained 7 variables with a total score of 12.5 points

  • predisposing factors
    • previous DVT or PE - 1.5 points
    • recent surgery or immobilization - 1.5 points
    • cancer - 1 point
  • symptoms
    • haemoptysis - 1 point
  • clinical signs
    • heart rate >100 beats/min - 1.5 points
    • clinical signs of DVT - 3 points
  • clinical judgement
    • alternative diagnosis less likely than PE - 3 points

The clinical probability can be divided according to the points scored into:

  • three-category scheme
    • low 0-1 points
    • intermediate 2-6 points
    • high 7 or more points
  • two-category scheme
    • PE unlikely 0-4 points
    • PE likely >4 points

Reference:


Create an account to add page annotations

Annotations allow you to add information to this page that would be handy to have on hand during a consultation. E.g. a website or number. This information will always show when you visit this page.

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2024 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.